This is the cached copy of http://www.wellington.govt.nz/plans/policies/centres/pdfs/centres.pdf

Page 1
CENTRES POLICY
29 August 2008

Page 2
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE OF POLICY
This Policy provides a framework to guide the development and
management of Wellington City’s centres. Centres are the focus of
economic and social life in our communities. They have multiple
functions and activities, but their core is typically retail and local
services. Wellington City has an established network of centres,
from the central city which has a citywide and regional role, to the
larger town centres serving several suburbs (such as Johnsonville
and Kilbirnie) through to smaller centres serving their local areas
and neighbourhoods.
The Centres Policy considers in an integrated way the varied roles
of the centres, to provide guidance on how they should be
managed and developed in the future, and to assist in coordinating
the Council’s activities and programmes in and around these centres.
It will be supported and implemented through more detailed policies
(including the District Plan and centre plans), the Council’s infrastructure
investment decisions and specific projects and initiatives.
1.2 OVERALL APPROACH
Centres are key locations for future urban growth and support the
Council’s Urban Development Strategy. The Growth Spine is built
around these centres connected by a high quality transport corridor.
The overall intent of the Policy is to maintain and strengthen our
existing and planned centres. For the larger centres this will mean
retaining their role as primary places to shop and growing their multi-
functional nature by facilitating residential development, employment
growth and increasing the range of facilities and services available.
For the smaller centres this will mean retaining and strengthening
their role in providing accessible convenience shopping and local
community services. For all centres it is also important to improve the
quality of urban design and to maximise their potential to achieve more
sustainable forms of development.
A hierarchy of centres has been introduced to provide guidance on
their role and function, and will assist in assessing the appropriateness
of proposed developments. This is supported by defining ‘Planning
Areas’ based around each of the larger centres to provide a common
spatial planning framework to assist the Council’s investment
programmes in areas such as infrastructure and community facilities
and to ensure integrated planning (refer to Hierarchy of Centres map
on page 9.
1.3 WELLINGTON’S CENTRES
Wellington has a well established network of centres across the city,
each with different roles and functions, reflecting their location,
population catchment, size and historical development pattern.
The central city has always played a dominant role as the primary
centre of both Wellington City and indeed the region as a whole.
It continues to be the primary shopping centre (especially for
comparison and speciality goods), as well as the major employment
centre for the region, a focus for civic and State functions and an
entertainment and events hub.
The inner and outer suburbs are also well served by a network of
centres, with a relatively even distribution of the six larger sub-regional
and town centres through the urban area supported by 30 district
and neighbourhood centres. The only identified gaps are in the more
recently developed northern suburbs, where some suburbs are growing
without suitable access to local convenience shopping or a community
focal point. The planned centres for Churton Park and Lincolnshire Farm
will help complete the network.
In recent years a number of other retail destinations have been
developed, often based on large-format retail activities (ie Rongotai
retail park). These have a single-activity focus and do not have the same
functions and roles as centres. There are also a number of areas across
the city that are primarily used for industrial activities – again these
have a single-activity focus and are not considered to be centres.
1.4 THE ROLE OF CENTRES
Centres are the focus for much of the economic and social life of their
communities. They provide accessible shopping and local services
to meet people’s day-to-day needs. The larger the centre – the
greater the range of activities and functions typically located there.
It is the combination of activities and functions that makes centres
particularly important places, as it enables them to deliver a range of
environmental, social, economic and cultural benefits.
The role of larger centres should include:
as a consequence of people moving about in the same space, and
centres are the most important places for such meetings, particularly
as they are more than often the location for community and
entertainment facilities. Centres also have a role in defining our
identity and our local community.
on housing – this means that retail is a critical factor in the
economic viability of centres. Retail (particularly supermarkets and
large department stores) makes viable the co-location of specialist
retailing and a range of services that are visited less often.
transport routes pass through or close to centres. People living in
and around centres are able to walk to access these services. Even
when the primary transport mode is a private vehicle, centres
provide significant environmental benefits, by enabling people to
combine one vehicle trip with multiple purposes (ie to shop, access
services, visit community facilities, meet other people and go to
work). Reducing vehicle emissions is a key element in reducing the
city’s carbon footprint. Maintaining and strengthening our centres is
also important to ensure Wellington has an urban environment that
is resilient to future changes such as climate change and peak oil.
significant concentrations of employment. Many of the businesses in
these centres are within the service sector – one of the growth areas
of the economy.
surrounds are also proposed to be the focus for more intensive
housing growth over the next 50 years, with the review of infill
housing anticipating that 60% of future growth will occur in and
around centres.

Page 3
2
OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Objective 1 To identify the role and function of each centre within
Wellington City and provide a spatial framework for integrated planning.
The Wellington Regional Strategy identified the CBD as the key
regional centre, and Johnsonville and Kilbirnie as two of eight
sub-regional centres. This is being reflected in the review of the
Regional Policy Statement.
To support the centre hierarchy and to provide a suitable spatial
context for integrated centre planning and development, 11 Planning
Areas have been identified. These recognise that centres, through
their multiple functions, are inextricably linked to their surrounding
areas. They provide a context for centre development and integrated
planning and have been based on a combination of factors including
geographical catchments for centres, topography and physical
boundaries, communities of interest, social and political boundaries,
and transport and infrastructure networks.
POLICY 1.1
Retail development within centres should be of a scale and intensity
appropriate to the place of that centre in the hierarchy. Redevelopment
opportunities are likely to be of greater scale and intensity in the larger
centres and of lesser scale and intensity in smaller centres.
POLICY 1.2
The identified Planning Areas (and the centres within them) will
be used to assist in integrated place-based planning, including the
integrated planning of Council activities and programmes.
APPROACH
To identify the role and function of each centre, a hierarchy has been
introduced (see Appendix 1). The hierarchy classifies each centre based
on a range of factors including its comparative size and land area,
population catchment, type of retail, range of activities, facilities and
services, and levels of accessibility. There are five different types of
centres in Wellington: the central city; two sub-regional centres,
four town centres; six district centres; and 24 neighbourhood centres.
The purpose of this hierarchy is to:
and the rest of the region;
as major centres to service their suburban catchments providing for
the weekly shopping, service and community needs;
providing day-to-day convenience shopping for the neighbourhood
as well as an important focus for neighbourhood services;
do not take on the role and function of centres or undermine their
viability or vitality;
office) does not undermine the role and function of centres higher
up in the hierarchy, due to an inappropriate scale.

Page 4
3
Objective 2 To maintain and strengthen the central city as the primary
centre within the city and region for shopping, employment, city-living,
culture and entertainment, tourism and major events, and ensure that
development in other locations does not compromise this role.
POLICY 2.1
The role of Wellington as the nation’s capital will be celebrated and
strengthened.
POLICY 2.2
A Central City Framework will be developed to guide the integrated
development and management of the area. This will include the
consideration of the following strategies and their implementation
at a place-based level:
POLICY 2.3
A focus will continue to be placed on projects to maintain and improve
the quality of the public realm in the central city to make it more
attractive to businesses, workers, residents and visitors.
POLICY 2.4
Retail proposals elsewhere in the city will only be supported where
they are of a scale that does not impact on the long-term viability and
vitality of the central city.
POLICY 2.5
The central city is the preferred location for major office developments
(over 5000m2 gross floor area).
APPROACH
The importance of the central city to both Wellington City and the region
as a whole cannot be underestimated. As an employment centre it
provides jobs for over 70,000 people (over 30% of all jobs within the
region). As a shopping centre it has the largest concentration of retail in
the region and is dominant in comparison goods, fashion and speciality
shopping. The Golden Mile is of particular importance to the City,
and is viewed by investors as Wellington’s ‘outdoor mall’. As a living
environment it now houses over 12,000 people in a range of apartments
providing a ‘city-living’ option for the region’s population. It is an
entertainment and events centre and a public transport hub, being the
terminus for the region’s rail network and the main ‘conduit’ for most
of the bus routes. As a national capital, it houses most of the major
government departments, Parliament and other national institutions.
The importance of the central city to the economic and social health of
the whole region is recognised in the Wellington Regional Strategy and
the Regional Policy Statement.
The approach is therefore to maintain and strengthen the central city,
to ensure that it retains its primacy as an employment and retail centre,
to further increase its residential population, and to strengthen its other
roles and functions. The concentration of office-based employment in
the central city, combined with the significant retail offer of the Golden
Mile, and the high quality of the public realm is critical to maintaining
the international competitiveness of Wellington and achieving
sustainable development outcomes.
Plan Change 48 has recently established a robust planning policy to
guide the future development of the central city. To support this, a non-
statutory framework is proposed to facilitate integrated development
and management on a place-based basis, encompassing both Council
activities and the activities of other stakeholders.
In addition, Plan Change 66 has introduced new provisions to allow
Council to consider and manage the effects of large integrated retail
developments proposed in the Central Area and Suburban Centres. Council
seeks to ensure that any new development enhances the sustainability
of existing retail centres (including the existing hierarchy of centres), does
not compromise the sustainability of the transport network, and does not
result in the unsustainable location of retail activities.

Page 5
4
investment and improvement;
contributes towards the achievement of this Centres Policy;
implement centre plans;
POLICY 3.3
The feasibility of establishing mechanisms such as Business
Improvement Districts will be investigated to provide additional tools to:
environmental and social issues;
community.
POLICY 3.4
The Council’s programme for public space and centres development will
be regularly reviewed to ensure the priorities reflect and support the
Council’s Urban Development Strategy, and integrate with the following
policies and plans:
POLICY 3.5
wherever possible, be located in or on the edge of centres. Council will
work with central government agencies to encourage the appropriate
location of facilities such as schools, hospitals, health services and
customer service centres.
APPROACH
The Council has a significant influence on the nature of centres through
the regulation of development, its investment in infrastructure,
improvements to the public realm, through the development of
community facilities and its ongoing city management role. It is
important that these varied activities and other specific initiatives
maximise the benefits to the city through coordination and integration
on a place-basis.
A particular proposal under consideration to assist in the future
management of our centres is the use of Business Improvement Districts
(BIDs). These have been extensively used in other parts of the country
(sometimes known as ‘Mainstreet’ programmes) and overseas and
can be an effective way of building local ownership and providing a
funding base to address local environmental and social issues and to
facilitate economic development opportunities. Marsden Village, Karori,
is the only current example of such a mechanism in the city that is
funded through targeted rates, however there are other business-led
organisations such as the Courtenay Accord and Enterprise Miramar.
BIDs are a form of private-public partnership that generate funding
They take the form of an incorporated society with a management
committee and with members having voting rights.
POLICY 3.1
Centre plans will be developed to facilitate the strengthening of
centres and to ensure integrated and sustainable development.
These will integrate Council’s aspirations for centres expressed through
the Council’s policies and planning documents and will be developed
as resources allow, in the following priority order:
and Kilbirnie;
part of the review of infill housing;
will impact on the overall form and operation of that centre;
POLICY 3.2
Centre plans will be supported by the Council through:
functions;
improved where gaps are found or opportunities identified;
Objective 3 To strengthen the multi-functional nature of centres,
including their role as social and community foci, public transport hubs,
places where people live and work, and centres for entertainment,
recreation and local services.

Page 6
5
Large Format Retail Activity
Locational Preferences
Centres
Work Areas
Live/Work areas
(a) Yard-based activities (ie. building
supplies, garden centres, car sales,
agricultural supplies)
a
(b) Trade suppliers (ie. tiles, paint,
electrical supplies, plumbing supplies,
catering supplies)
a
a
(c) Bulky comparison goods (ie. whiteware
and appliances, furniture, office products,
carpets, bedding)
a
a
(d) General merchandise (ie. supermarkets,
hypermarkets, discount stores, department
stores, homewares, clothing)
a
5
Objective 4 To manage the location of retail activities to ensure they
support Wellington’s compact urban form, provide for sustainable
transport options and an efficient use of resources, and support the
long-term vitality and viability of existing centres.
demand and car use;
and viability of existing centres;
not require further direct or indirect investment in public
infrastructure or facilities that cannot be funded from development
contributions;
infrastructure.
POLICY 4.2
Proposals for supermarkets (and hypermarkets selling fresh produce) will
generally only be supported within or on the edge of existing centres.
POLICY 4.3
The Council has the following preferences for locating larger-format
retail within the City:
APPROACH
The development of out-of-centre retail destinations has the potential
to adversely affect the viability and vitality of existing centres. Although
there has been limited development of this type in the city to date,
there is considerable pressure, and opportunities will no doubt continue
to emerge as ‘windfall’ sites come onto the market or as the economics
of development changes.
Most out-of-centre retail activity comes with few of the co-location or
added economic, environmental and social benefits presented by a
mixed-use centre. Whilst they may offer a “price to market” advantage
to consumers, due to their low land costs and lower operating costs, this
is only one of a number of costs and benefits that have to be considered
generate increased total transport trips, higher use of private vehicles
and consequent environmental impacts. If they are of sufficient scale,
and depending on location, they can also threaten the viability and
vitality of existing centres and devalue public spending on infrastructure
in existing centres (ie. roads, public transport, public realm, community
facilities, and streetscape enhancements). In some cases significant new
retail developments may require additional infrastructure to support
them at a cost to ratepayers – this can result in duplicated services and
increased pressure on already stretched funding.
Retail that falls into the general merchandise category: hypermarkets,
supermarkets or clothing and fashion categories, regardless of whether
it is large-format or not, generates high levels of repeat visitation and
can generate much greater economic, social and environmental benefits
if it is located in a mixed-activity centre and co-located with other
complementary or even competitive stores.
goods retail generate infrequent visits as the purchase price is high
and the goods for sale are often not consumables but capital assets.
Stores selling these goods are by necessity of the product – large,
requiring extensive building footprints, large servicing and car parking
areas. They are often not suitable or viable to locate in centres, and an
out-of-centre location can be justified.
POLICY 4.1
Any proposal for larger-scale retail development outside of a centre will
not be supported unless it can demonstrate that it will:
transport, walking and cycling;
POLICY 4.4
any ‘General Merchandise’ categories) will be investigated. This should
be located on the edge of an existing centre where it can be accessible
by a range of transport nodes and without affecting the long-term
viability and vibrancy of the central city or existing town centres.

Page 7
6
POLICY 5.1
Residential development in all centres will be supported where it:
POLICY 5.2
Residential development within larger centres identified as ‘Areas
of Change’ should be of a higher density and based on apartment
typologies.
POLICY 5.3
Residential development in areas around centres and identified
as ‘Areas of Change’ should be medium-density and be based on
townhouse and unit typologies.
Objective 5 To support centres through targeting future residential
growth in and around those centres identified as suitable for change due
to good transport accessibility, suitable physical characteristics and lower
sensitivity to changes to character.
APPROACH
The review of infill housing has identified ‘Areas of Change’ where
future residential intensification could occur over the next 50 years.
All of these are based in and around centres because these areas offer
the greatest benefits. Residential development can support the long-
term viability and vitality of centres by increasing populations within
areas within walking distance, increasing the number of people on the
streets and using facilities and services, improving night-time safety,
and maximising the utilisation of existing public transport networks.

Page 8
7
Objective 6 To ensure there is a sufficient supply of land available for
industrial activities to meet the long-term needs of the city.
POLICY 6.1
Work Areas and Live Work Areas should not take on the role and
functions of centres although a limited range of ancillary services that
meet local needs and maximise accessibility may be appropriate.
POLICY 6.2
The development of non-industrial uses in Work Areas will be
controlled through the District Plan by limiting the scale and type
of non-industrial use locating there.
APPROACH
In the early 1990s the Council adopted a new approach to managing
all of the centres outside of the central city. This created a single District
Plan zoning (Suburban Centre) that applies to all of the city’s centres
(excluding the central city) as well as industrial areas and other mixed-
use areas. The rules for this zone placed no restriction on activities,
subject to compliance with basic environmental standards such as
noise, glare, servicing and parking.
In some centres this zoning has facilitated a significant shift in the
of residential and retail activities into areas previously dominated by
commercial and industrial uses, where existing industrial activities
‘lose out’ to the highest and best land use activities.
Research undertaken for the Council has identified that the availability
of industrial and employment land within Wellington City will be in
short supply in the future and that there is a need to recognise that
a broad range of industrial activities are not occurring in Wellington.
Forecast projections indicate that there will be a substantial increase in
land demand for industrial land of between 77-100 hectares over the
2007-2021 period – there is insufficient industrial land supplied within
Wellington City to cater for this projected demand.
The existing market-led approach has the potential to restrict the
growth of service industries which are critical in particular, to the overall
economy of the city, and also affect the integrity and character of these
traditionally industrial nodes.

Page 9
Objective 7 To improve the urban design quality of all centres and build
on their sense of place.
8
POLICY 7.1
The quality of urban design in centres will be improved by including
in the District Plan:
verandahs, glazing);
provide additional guidance to assessment;
appropriate.
APPROACH
The only urban design assessment currently applicable to development
in the Suburban Centre zone is for retail activities over 500m2
(under Plan Change 52) and for multi-unit residential development.
Consultation as part of the Suburban Centre review has revealed strong
support (84% of respondents) for improving the quality of urban design
in centres. Development in centres has a particular public prominence
that deserves special attention and the design of buildings and spaces
around them have a strong influence on the public realm where social
interaction occurs. As such, it is proposed to widen the triggers for urban
design assessment in centres and where possible to apply specific rules
to improve outcomes. This broadly follows the approach taken in the
central city (Plan Change 48).
Public feedback on the Draft Centres Policy highlighted again that
there is strong support (78%) for the improvement of urban design
quality of all centres through the development of a centres design
guide and taking design into account in assessing resource consents
for new developments.

Page 10
10
9
8
6
7
5
4
2
1
3
11
Johnsonville
Kilbirnie
Crofton Downs
Newlands
Churton Park
Island Bay
Brooklyn
Khandal ah
Miramar
Newtown
Karori
Tawa
Hierarchy of Centres
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
Metres
SCALE @ A1:
1:30,000
Map Legend
NEIGHBOURHOOD CENTRES
LIVE / WORK AREAS (MIXED USE)
WORK AREAS
PLANNING AREAS
1
ROADS
SH1
Major Roads
DISTRICT CENTRES
SUB-REGIONAL
CENTRES
TOWN CENTRES
CENTRAL WELLINGTON
Constable Street, Newtown
Crofton Road, Ngaio
Darlington Road, Miramar
Hataitai
Kelburn
Lincolnshire Neighbourhood
Linden
Marsden Vil age
Mersey Street, Island Bay
Newlands Road
Ngaio
Northland
Onepu Road, Lyal Bay
Roseneath
Seatoun
Shorland Park Shops, I. Bay
Standen Street Shops, Karori
Strathmore
Thorndon
Tringham Street, Karori
Wadestown
Aro Val ey
Berhampore
Broadway, Strathmore
Adelaide Road
Glenside
Greta Point
Kaiwharawhara
Miramar South
Oxford Street, Tawa
Park Road , Miramar
Ropa Lane, Miramar
Shel y Bay
South Newtown
Tawa East
Tawa South
Col ins Avenue
Grenada North
Kiwi Point Quarry
Landfil
Lincolnshire Farm
Newlands/Ngauranga
Ngauranga
Rongotai East
Rongotai South
Takapu Island
Tawa Street, Tawa
Rongotai West
HIERARCHY OF CENTRES MAP
KEY
T Town Centres
D District Centres
Planning Area Boundaries
9
1

Page 11
APPENDIX 1 - CENTRE HIERARCHY
10
CENTRE TYPE
FUTURE ROLES AND FUNCTION
Central City
1
– extensive retail offer (ie >100,000m
2
total floorspace)
– several department stores and full range of retail goods and specialist stores
– civic centre and centre of government
– major regional employment node (including large corporate offices)
– central community facilities
– extensive residential uses (ie apartments)
– extensive recreational and entertainment activities
– major cultural institutions
– visitor facilities, including accommodation
– high level of pedestrian activity
– central public transport hub
– extensive on-street and off-street parking
Sub-Regional
2
Johnsonville
Kilbirnie
3
– servicing a significant part of the city or region
– significant retail offer (ie between 20,000 - 50,000m
2
total floorspace)
– anchored by traditional main street, with at least one or more large supermarket and
department store, and a wide range of retail goods, some specialist stores
– civic or government services
– major employment node
– hub for community facilities
– residential uses above ground floor
– range of recreational and entertainment activities
– medium-scale office uses
– high level of pedestrian activity on main street
– sub-regional public transport hub
– significant on-street and off-street parking
Town Centres
Karori
Miramar
Tawa
– servicing one or more suburbs
– large retail offer (ie between 10,000 - 20,000m
2
total floorspace)
– anchored by traditional main street, with at least one or more large supermarket and a
range of retail goods
– some civic or government services
– employment node
– range of community facilities
– residential uses above ground floor
– recreational and entertainment activities
– medium-scale professional office uses
– high level of pedestrian activity on main street
– very good accessibility by public transport
– on-street and off-street parking
District Centres
Brooklyn
Churton Park
4
Crofton Downs
Island Bay
Khandallah
– servicing surrounding suburb
– moderate retail offer (ie <10,000m
2
total floorspace) including convenience-based retail
– residential uses above ground floor
– community facilities and services
– recreational and entertainment activities
– small-scale professional office uses
– very good accessibility by public transport
– on-street and limited off-street parking

Page 12
APPENDIX 1 - Continued...
11
Neighbourhood Centres
Aro Valley
Berhampore
Broadway, Strathmore
Darlington Road, Miramar
Hataitai
Kelburn
Lincolnshire Farm
5
Linden
Marsden Village
Mersey Street, Island Bay
Roseneath
Seatoun
Shorland Park shops, Island Bay
Standen Street shops, Karori
Strathmore
Thorndon
Tringham Street, Karori
Wadestown
– servicing surrounding residential neighbourhood
– small retail offer based on convenience-based retail (ie <2,000m
2
total floorspace)
servicing day-to-day needs
– community services
– small-scale professional offices and specialist retail
– easy pedestrian access to neighbourhood area
– good accessibility by public transport
– generally on-street parking

Page 13
12
OTHER AREAS (Not Centres)
FUTURE ROLES AND FUNCTIONS
Work Areas
Collins Avenue
Kiwi Point Quarry
Landfill
Lincolnshire Farm
6
Rongotai East
Rongotai South
Takapu Island
6
Tawa Street, Tawa
– high proportion of employment activities
– yard-based activities, trade suppliers and limited large-format retail activities
(excluding general merchandise) as per Policy 4.3
– no community or entertainment facilities
– no supermarkets and limited food retailing
– no residential activities
– offices ancillary to main activity on site
– small-scale retail ancillary to main activity on site
– low pedestrian volumes
– moderate accessibility by public transport at peak times
Live/Work Areas
Adelaide Road
Glenside
Greta Point
Kaiwharawhara
Miramar South
Park Road, Miramar
Rongotai West
Ropa Lane, Miramar
Shelly Bay
7
Tawa East
Tawa South
Mixed uses, including:
– employment activities, light industrial, commercial and business services, limited large-format
retail activities (excluding general merchandise) as per Policy 4.3, recreational and
entertainment uses, residential activities, local community services
1
The Wellington Regional Strategy identified the CBD as the key regional centre. This is being reflected in the review of the Regional Policy Statement.
2
The Wellington Regional Strategy identified Johnsonville and Kilbirnie as two of eight sub-regional centres. This is being reflected in the review of the Regional Policy Statement.
3
The Kilbirnie Sub-Regional Centre is not a tightly defined area in the same way as Johnsonville – it is instead made up of several parts that are located within a wider catchment, but which
together have the characteristics of a sub-regional centre. It consists of the town centre itself, major community-based facilities such as the Wellington Regional Aquatic Centre and the
proposed Indoor Community Sports Centre; employment and large-format retail nodes around the Western Apron and Rongotai West and the Wellington International Airport. Building and
improving connections between these parts will be a key aim of this Policy.
4
Proposed centre, not yet constructed
5
Proposed business park (Plan Change 45) not yet constructed
6
Subject to Plan Change 47.
APPENDIX 1 - Continued...

Page 14
APPENDIX 2 – PLANNING AREAS
13
PLANNING AREA
SUBURBS
CENTRES
1
Tawa
Takapu Valley
Town Centre
– Tawa
– Linden
2
Churton Park
Glenside
Grenada Village
Horokiwi
Woodridge
Paparangi
Johnsonville
Broadmeadows
Sub-Regional Centre
– Johnsonville
District Centres
– Churton Park
3
Makara
Makara Beach
4
Khandallah
Kaiwharawhara
Wadestown
Wilton
Crofton Downs
District Centres
– Crofton Downs
– Khandallah
– Crofton Road
– Wadestown
5
Karori
Town Centre
– Karori
– Marsden Village
– Standen Street shops
– Tringham Street
6
Kelburn
Aro Valley
Highbury
Brooklyn
Vogeltown
Mornington
Kingston
District Centre
– Brooklyn
– Aro Valley
– Kelburn

Page 15
14
7
Thorndon
Pipitea
Wellington Central
Te Aro
Mt Cook
Mt Victoria
Roseneath
– Central City
– Roseneath
– Thorndon
8
Berhampore
Town Centre
– Berhampore
– Constable Street
9
Island Bay
Southgate
Houghton Bay
District Centre
– Island Bay
– Mersey Street, Island Bay
– Shorland Park shops, Island Bay
10
Rongotai
Lyall Bay
Melrose
Hataitai
Kilbirnie
Sub-Regional Centre
– Kilbirnie
– Hataitai
11
Maupuia
Karaka Bays
Miramar
Seatoun
Strathmore Park
Breaker Bay
Moa Point
Town Centre
– Miramar
– Broadway, Strathmore
– Darlington Road, Miramar
– Seatoun
– Strathmore
APPENDIX 2 – Continued...